<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/1141062981190987449?origin\x3dhttp://destructormachine.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

the destructor machine

welcome. a blog of random thoughts and ideas, music, literature, everyday happenings and the like for those out there.

eXTReMe Tracker

Qué onda, negro

Americans who act liberal and open-minded can be just as annoying those knee-jerk conservatives. I find that for some, the liberalism they espouse is just a show put on to convince the rest of us that they are quite modern, quite appropriate, and of course en vogue. There is a difference between on one hand recognizing the problems in society and consequently trying to improve them and on the other choosing to act like those problems never ever apply to you. What do I mean? Here is an example:

I am taking a class with the study abroad program called Historical Perspectives of Chile or something to that effect. There are two particularly white (and one particularly obnoxious) women in the class who find it necessary to comment upon every little thing said by the professor. It gets to be quite annoying after awhile, especially when they don’t particularly add anything intelligent to the topic or the conversation. (Example 1 Professor: Chileans don’t like Peruvians. Girl One: Oh I know. My brother said something to that effect yesterday. Example 2 Professor: Isn’t that funny? Girl Two: HAHAHAHAHA.)

Last class, the professor was relating to us a particular news article about discrimination published by El Mercurio, one of the more popular daily papers here. It turns out that people feel like there is a fair amount discrimination based upon your physical appearance, and in fact that category of discrimination appeared second in the list with a response of 24%. As an example, the professor told us a story about how he was walking in the streets in the center of the city alone in the middle of the night, which of course is pretty dangerous especially when he was carrying a bag, and he saw two people walking towards him. Judging by the facial characteristics of these two men, my professor had a gut reaction to flee in order to save his wallet and perhaps a trip to the hospital (which he mentioned later saved him two other times in the center of the city). But right before he decided to bolt, he heard that their accent was Peruvian, and immediately he calmed down. However, afterwards it struck him quite hard because it showed that there are facial characteristics associated with criminals or dangerous people based upon how indigenous you look. Although Chileans refuse to recognize it, racism exists.

What were the reactions of these two (white, blonde, well-dressed, private university attending, expatriate) girls? Imagine this nearly simultaneously:

Girl Two: OMG, I can’t believe you did that. It’s so ironic that you had that reaction, especially when you teach what you teach and you think what you think. It is quite inappropriate, and it is so horrible that Chileans have this racism against the indigenous people and against Peruvians. I can’t believe it.

Girl One: Oh that’s ok. You know what? I had the very same thing happen to me when I was in the United States, but nothing really happened. It’s so horrible and cruel and it makes no sense. Don’t worry, it’s ok.

Girl Two: You know what, I went to this rap concert in Chile with some group and they were like saying stuff that was so blatantly offensive I couldn’t believe it. Do you know what they were saying? Qué pasa, negro? And I was like sitting there, thinking, OMG I am like 60 years in the past! I can’t believe that people think like this…………

And so on and so forth.

Blabbering like that doesn’t prove anything about you nor does it solve any of the problems of the society. In fact, ultimately it sounds more like an exercise in political correctness, which basically tries to avoid critical social issues under this veil of politeness and respect. I can’t imagine these particular girls, walking in the streets of an urban downtown area and seeing two black men approach them, would feel quite happy and safe, affirming that in America we respect other people and their identities. By my judgment, they would scream, call the cops, call their mother, call their ex-boyfriend’s frat brothers, pray to God, pray to the Devil, pray to oh what was that Hindu god that I studied in my hip college religion class?, and pull out their can of mace (or a gun, depending on how pro-Second Amendment Republican their father is). To me it makes no sense for them to pretend like the professor’s reaction was out of place or that they don’t have such strong reactions to racial stereotypes.

Aside: The rhetoric surrounding this whole discussion is somewhat ironic as well. The very fact that these girls claim to have already accepted those with pejorative racial characteristics still suggests that there is a hierarchy of power: there are people who need to accept (the majority with the valorized racial characteristics) as well as the people who need to be accepted (those with pejorative racial characteristics).

In the end, those girls do have racial stereotypes and in a dangerous situation they will act upon them. Everybody does. To pretend like they don’t perhaps is part of the racial problem in America. It seems like the first thing people say is “I am not racist, but…” Just because you take a certain position in front of your coffee-shop friends doesn’t necessarily mean that in real life you think or act that way. Just because you sit in a classroom and act offended on behalf of black people around the world doesn’t mean that two lifetime criminals are not going to rob that white drunk ass sorority girl stumbling confusedly in the streets of New Orleans. I find it really doesn’t help in the end.* It doesn’t really change you nor does it change the situation. And thus, such an attitude is just for show.

*Don’t get me wrong. I think discussions about the senselessness of racism and the arbitrariness of the values of racial characteristics are very helpful. But to claim or imply that such racist tendencies don’t apply to you (and this of course goes from any racial/social/cultural perspective) is just false, and ultimately it doesn’t really serve anybody. Why do they take such offense? Why are they so horrified? Those same attitudes, like it or not, are a part of the landscape of American culture. To valorize their positions as holier-than-thou, sinless angels not only alienates others but worsens a fundamental problem of the American society.

Labels: ,

please leave a message.
Comment | Bookmark | Go to end
  • Blogger Der Jasager says:
    August 19, 2007 at 5:00 PM  

    there should be a qualification test for people wanting to study abroad. or we could just not let blondes leave the US.

    oh btw, i think that hindu god you're thinking of is allah. top

  • Blogger KNG says:
    August 20, 2007 at 11:58 AM  

    allah? hindu? I'm embarrased. top

  • Blogger Huck says:
    August 22, 2007 at 11:08 AM  

    Hola, mi amigo! I agree with you on the politically-correct silliness of these two girls. I think their reactions, though, need to be understood as an incomplete and not-very-well-thought-out style of "liberalism" (though I, as a liberal myself, take issue a bit with how you assign liberal values to what is essentially immature behavior. Some of us liberals actually like to think that we have a more mature and reflective approach to such things! ;-)

    Sure, we all have certain thoughts cross our minds in certain situations that may have a racial basis to them (i.e. walking on a quiet uptown side street in New Orleans and seeing two young black males walking towards me does make me a bit uncomfortable). Now, I'd agree with the two girls that there's something inherently problematic with this kind of reaction in the sense that it is based in a racism of sorts. Let me explain. It is a fact that violent crime in New Orleans is mostly perpetrated by young black males. If the fact were that violent crime were mostly committed by elderly white females, I'd probably be nervous crossing paths with elderly white females. Being cautious about where risk is is not racist in itself. But what is racist is the historical reasons WHY violent crimes are associated with young black males and not elderly white females. That is worthy of some discussion, and that is what makes me feel uncomfortable when my fear and danger radar goes up with I cross the paths of some young black males.

    These girls are just trying to overcompensate in a silly and immature way how they witness the basic inequities in society that are caused by real racism. They should probably be more reflective before opening their mouths and jabbering some rote PC nonsense; but that's a product of their age and level of maturity -- not a product of their "liberalism."

    Peace, amigo! top

  • Blogger jkim says:
    August 22, 2007 at 6:59 PM  

    It seems to me that silly/immature behavior is easily confused with liberalism. I guess I did assign liberal values to such behavior.

    However, I do think that there are a lot of people act (or think they are) "liberal" because they think that they should. I feel like this is the majority of American college students.

    I have no problem with liberal thought, and I think really it can be a much more sensible way to approach society. I suppose I consider myself liberal on most things.

    What annoyed me about these girls is that their comments are essentially for show and no more. The fact that they implicitly deny that such racist thoughts go through their head as well destroys the chance for any constructive dialogue to take place about the real problem of racism in our society. I have a problem with thinking that young black males are going to rob me, yet I still feel uncomfortable when two black men cross my path at night. Why? I do think a discussion of the historical/social/structural reasons is extremely necessary, but it would help more if it came from an acknowledgement that these forces live within oneself instead of in a sociology study.

    I ultimately dont know if they are liberal. They might be, they might not. I was more caught up in the falseness of their hipocrisy. I don't think that it is a reflection on liberals either; rather it shows how these girls espouse a particularly correct position (which perhaps is associated with liberalism) that is en vogue to make themselves feel progressive or something to that effect. top

  • Blogger Peter Bae says:
    August 24, 2007 at 5:53 PM  

    You're right. Society has branded liberalism as one without basis, where one does not need any basis, but rather as a disposition to just argue off of what comes to one's mind, thus the term "free thinking."

    On the other hand, conservatives are branded as though they have a huge canon of written thoughts behind them, including no less the Bible and all the literature that surrounds such values. An arsenal, if you will.

    It's perhaps from these two types of branding and polarization-- free thinking vs. thinking based on references to old-values-- that perpetuates the misusage of the word "liberal," degenerating it into a label for those uninformed people who open their gape freely. top

  • Blogger Huck says:
    August 24, 2007 at 9:30 PM  

    "The fact that they implicitly deny that such racist thoughts go through their head as well destroys the chance for any constructive dialogue to take place about the real problem of racism in our society."

    I know what you mean here, but I'd be careful not to fall into the same trap that these young women apparently have fallen into, which is to classify their thoughts when faced with danger based on risk assessment as racist. As I tried to say earlier, sure there is a racial dimension to such reactions at one level; but simply assessing risk based on available data and responding accordingly is not necessarily racist. What you seem to be saying is that these girls are just as racist as the rest of us if they have such thoughts, and they should stop playing the hypocrite about it. But I'd say that if we understood such thoughts as not being necessarily racist and rather tried to understand why such thoughts occur in the context of our social structure, then there wouldn't be the need to overcompensate for having such thoughts by throwing out the immature "oh-my-gawd-can-you-believe-such-racist-behavior" platitudes. It is reflexively thinking of such reactions as racist which gets us into this trouble to begin with.

    Peace! top